Thursday, October 11, 2012

Watch What You Write on Your Wall…

Jill is very upset with Jack and vented her frustrations on Facebook.  Her friends “liked” her comments.  Unfortunately, Jill forgot that one of her friends is also friends with Jack’s teenage niece who has her phone glued to her hip and who instantaneously saw the comment Jill made about her uncle.  Of course, she immediately shared it with her mother, Jack’s sister.  Even if Jill wanted to erase her comment, it is too late and Jack has already seen it. 

Social networking services such as Facebook, Linkedin or Twitter have not only become a “marriage killer” – you would be surprise to learn how many people discovered that their spouse was cheating through these means -  they also have the potential of becoming a “best case” killer in court or in a divorce settlement process.  When a separation gets ugly, spouses may be tempted to use social media as a channel to vent their anger, bash their ex-spouse’s actions and get support from common friends and family members in what they believe to be their “just cause”.   
 
If you are using social media to show off your new “hot” girlfriend to your buddies, or to gain support from your friends, rest assured that this evidence is going to find its way into the court room – or in your ex-spouse’s lawyer’s hands–quicker than you can think.  Yes, this type of evidence can be used against you in court and in other settlement processes.  Imagine, with your own actions and your own words you may give your ex-spouse the evidence he or she needs to discredit you and prove his or her point against you.  Your children could find your disparaging comments in future years.    It is hard for parents to argue that they have their children’s best interest at heart – and thus should be granted sole custody of them – when evidence proves that they have spent the past two months destroying the other parents’ reputation in social media.   Even worst, your children can be scared emotionally in the process, especially if your comments are available for the whole world to read. 

Finally, it is not enough to try to limit the damage by shutting down your existing account, locking down your privacy settings or “untagging” your images and pictures.  The damage may be impossible to control down the road as social media tends to leave permanent traces.  Remember that social networking services were created to help people stay in touch. Therefore, if one day you have the urge or the need to vent about your ex or the events related to your separation, just pick up the phone and talk to someone before writing it - permanently - on  your wall. 

Should we involve the Office of the Children’s Lawyer in our parenting dispute?


Jack thinks that Jill is unreasonable when making plans regarding the children.  She refuses to be flexible when it comes to dividing the time with the children on holidays, sharing information from the school, or letting him take the children for more than a few days here and there. Jack wants to have the children with him half the time to regain his place as a parent in their lives.  His friend has suggested that he should consider getting the Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OCL) involved but Jack is leery to engage the children in a process that he does not understand. 

The Office of the Children’s Lawyer is a government-funded organization that oversees that justice is being served on behalf of children (under 18 years of age) through the delivery of various services in the province of Ontario.  It is important to note, however, that the OCL’s involvement in custody and access cases is not automatic.  Their services may be requested by a judge in the context of a court case but there is no guarantee that the OCL will provide services.  If it does, then those services will be provided free of charge to the parents.  In essence, the OCL steps in as an objective third party to introduce some impartiality in disputes between parents.  The OCL can provide two very useful services: independent legal representation for children and custody and access assessments performed by trained social science professionals.

Independent legal representation will normally be provided when the child is older or at least sufficiently mature to express his opinion about his preferences. The child’s lawyer will be an advocate for the child and his/her role and responsibility will be to convey to the judge the child’s wishes and preferences with regards to the visitation arrangements that he would prefer.  For younger children or for families that present important challenges (such as allegations of domestic violence, substance abuse, parental alienation or where a child has special needs), the OCL may become involved by carrying out a comprehensive family assessment.  Following such an assessment, the OCL’s clinical investigators will report to the court to provide recommendations about the custody and access arrangements that would be best for the children.

The OCL’s services are very effective at helping parents make decisions that are in the best interest of their children, when they have not been able to do so on their own. Of course, it is always best for everybody when parents are able to agree between themselves as to what is best for their kids, as parents may not be happy with the recommendations made by an outsider, be it a judge or the professionals working for the OCL.